Miracles and Puppets | Interview with Eric Hovind Part 4

Eric discusses the possibility of miracles and the fact that all ministry should be done with puppets.

Find Eric Hovind at https://creationtoday.org

Posted in Interviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

Jesus, Sand and Stars | Interview with Eric Hovind Part 3

Eric Hovind talks about some of the reasons why we can know Christianity is true, and the way the heavens declare the glory of God.

Find Eric Hovind at https://creationtoday.org

 

Posted in Interviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

And I have to prove GOD? | Interview with Eric Hovind Part 2

Eric explains how the simple observation of nature shows that God is our creator, just as the Bible tells us.

Find Eric Hovind at: https://creationtoday.org

Posted in Interviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Trouble with Sunsets (Examining the Flat Earth with no help from NASA)

I recently wrote an article for Creation Today about the different ways in which Young Earth Creationists (YEC’s) and Flat Earthers interpret the Bible. You can read it here: https://creationtoday.org/flat-earth-vs-creationism-a-biblical-perspective/

In reply, I had a fellow named Scott imply that I had misunderstood and therefore misrepresented the perspective of Flat Earth believing Christians. During a jaunty bit of back and forth, I was reintroduced to some of the many arguments and evidences which are used in defense of the Flat Earth. One of these is an explanation for the sunset.

According to the flat earth model, the Earth is a essentially flat plane (as opposed to a ball) and the sun orbits around the north pole about 3,000 miles overhead (The sun is either 40 miles across or 300 miles across, depending on how you ask. Yeah, I know. There’s not one standard accepted flat earth model as of yet.). So how do they explain the appearance of sunset? It certainly looks as if the sun descends the sky and then falls below the horizon every day which, of course, fits the globe model we’ve been told in school but not the flat earth model. The answer, I was told, is simple. It’s all a matter of perspective.

Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 4 Comments

The Sun Does NOT Exist!

I’ve been talking with a flat earther- or whatever the term is which denotes a person who believes the earth is flat but does not also indicate a scathing and self important disdain for that person. His name is Scott, and thus far he has been very polite.

So Scott sent me a video which tries to explain that the sun “setting” is an illusion based on perspective. It’s pretty simple- if you’ve ever watched a plane fly overhead, you will notice that as it approaches, it starts out low in your field of vision and then appears to get HIGHER until it is over you, and then appears to get LOWER as it disappears toward the horizon- but it’s staying the same distance from the ground. The sun does the same thing (so the theory goes) and since this is what we observe when a plane at a constant and fairly close distance moves overhead, so it proves that the sun is also moving at a constant distance over us and only APPEARING to get higher and lower.

Well, I thought that would be easy to debunk, so I decided to take some pictures of the sun through a heavy filter to show that the sun doesn’t get SMALLER as it gets lower the way it should if it were close by and moving parallel to a flat surface. I thought, if I could show that the sun doesn’t change size, then this would debunk this theory.

But then I went outside. Continue reading →

Posted in atheism | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

The Reason Atheists Troll Christians

Since starting my apologetics blogs about a decade ago, I have noticed a strange thing. Persons claiming to be Atheists will show up in my comments sections, saying horrible things- telling me I’m an idiot, calling me a liar, etc. And they show up a LOT. You sort of get used to it after a while, like the stench from that pile of laundry you have been meaning to get to for a couple of weeks. Oh, wait, it’s April already? Ok so… well, the laundry has been a thing for a long time now. And it stinks. But you get used to it. That’s all I’m saying.

Image result for trolling Continue reading →

Posted in atheism | Tagged , | 26 Comments

I admit that modern art isn’t that good…

In reply to: https://abitoforange.com/2018/01/08/modern-art-sucks-because-atheism-is-stupid/

Your point is extremely flawed. Art doesn’t come from God, it comes from imagination. Now I admit that modern art isn’t that good, but I’m not in any position to critique anyone’s art style, and neither are you. Art is supposed to tell a story, have a meaning. What that meaning is, is up to the artist entirely. So no, there isn’t one true, explicit definition of art, because it varies from person to person. Saying atheism is making art bad is extremely foolish because it means that you are just a very closed minded person and you don’t open yourself up to the possibilities. Maybe I’m biased because I don’t necessarily think that the existence of God is likely, but directly blaming bad art on atheism is, to be blunt, dumb.

Greetings Carley,
Your comment is extremely flawed. I write these blog posts to communicate- to tell a story and have a meaning. What that meaning is, is up to me entirely. Criticizing my posts is extremely foolish because it means that you are just a very closed minded person and you don’t open yourself up to the possibilities. YOU are not in any position to critique MY blog posts.

(Are you going to apologize now? Have I shown you that you should NEVER offer a negative opinion about my writings ever again?
Has it occurred to you that I simply said to you what you said to me?
It should have. I think it was kind of obvious.) Continue reading →

Posted in Feedback Fridays, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Flat Earth vs Creationism – A Biblical perspective

This article was originally published at https://creationtoday.org/flat-earth-vs-creationism-a-biblical-perspective/

Are Creationists “Flat Earthers”?

While probably most creationists would answer with a resounding “NO” it must be admitted that there are Flat Earthers who are Creationists. These believers in the flat earth would argue that they reject evolution and the modern model of the solar system for the same reasons, and the central reason to some is the Bible.

But what is the relationship between the Flat Earth movement and Young Earth Creationism? Where did this movement come from? And are they right about what they think the Bible teaches? Continue reading →

Posted in The Creation SoapBox | Tagged | Leave a comment

Surfing like 60s Batman! | Interview with Eric Hovind Part 1

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Darwin On the Origin of… TROLLING?

The scientific world was rocked this week by the cover story of Historical Geographic Magazine, which sheds new light onto Charles Darwin’s own perspective on his now famous book, On the Origin of Species.

Page 35 of Charles Darwin’s Notebook

According to the March 26th article titled, “World’s Greatest Scientists Was World’s Greatest Prankster,” Darwin wrote in his diary, in what was to become the final week of his life, that his work “has turned out to be, beyond my greatest expectations, the most elaborate and hilarious prank the world has ever known!”

After piecing together many of Darwin’s writings from his private collections, including some kept within the family until recent years, the entire concept of Origin of Species, and in fact Darwinian evolution as we know it was an elaborate prank based on a family inside joke thought of on April 1, 1852.

In a very telling personal letter sent to a friend, Charles Darwin explained, “My grandfather, the late Erasmus Darwin, used to call his children ‘little monkeys’ and from that the idea grew to then write a brilliant satirical book, Zoonomia. This amused us, his grandchildren and other kin, most assuredly until milk did come forth out our noses! And it was while I was looking for work as a writer of humorous limericks when my dear wife did suggest that I write a similar novelization. But I had a most naughty vision of instead passing off his silly notion of being the children of monkeys and worms as actual science! From whence came the notion I do not know, but it amused us to no end.”

It seems that Darwin had intended to create this prank for the purpose of writing about the big reveal, wherein he would yell “I have fooled you!” to the men in attendance at the Royal Academy of Science—men Darwin considered “a vacant collection of godless blowhards, willing to accept anything except the truth”—but a bit of ill health kept him from the engagement. He writes in his diary following the public presentation of his book, “I cannot believe it! Whilst I have titled the book so as to directly state that natural selection is the origin of species, the very CAUSE of new kinds of plants and animals, yet I begin a chapter with a lucid explanation of how this CANNOT be so. Yet these “learned” men have bought it hook, line, and sinker!”

What would become known as “Darwin’s theory of evolution” gained popularity and in private circles would remain what Charles Darwin considered “the funniest thing I have ever accomplished upon this earth!” For the rest of his life Darwin created new versions of the book, each time intending to make the joke even easier to spot, expecting at any moment to be caught.

“I have written,” he says in a letter to his lawyer later in his life, “a sixth edition which is so rife with nonsense and contradiction that only the most stubborn of atheist or fool could fail to see the punchline written on every page! I only pray that I live to see these learned men of science someday soon wake with egg on their faces. The very notion that a puddle of mud could make life as the ancient pagans believed, and which has since been disproven by the Frenchman Pasteur, and that man by way of monkey could come to be would, I admit, be considered blasphemous were it not so cursedly hilarious! I have added sections at length about how the fossil record has failed to show any evidence of my so-called theory. In this latest edition, I even help out those simpletons who have been so taken in by my book by teaching them how their own eyes—which they must use to read my book—proves my book to be folly!

To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. Surely it cannot be funny only to me?

It seems that Darwin included in his writings proposed mechanisms of evolution which are “so absurdly incapable of what I am insisting they can do that I have confidence that a child of eight could give the game away.” He lists among these mechanisms genetic drift/migration, for as he says, “Surely it would take a bit of magic to create a new animal by taking a cow one already has and walking it across the yard!”

A full report on the historical research into what is now becoming known as Charles Darwin’s Prank on Science will be released by VanderHovind Books later this year. In the meantime, many universities are canceling evolution-based classes. Bill Nye and Richard Dawkins could not be reached for comment.

#JesusLovesYou

(This article was originally published at https://creationtoday.org/new-discovery-creates-darwin-on-darwin-controversy/ on April 1, 2019)

PS: Before you leave me an angry comment letting me know that you’ve Googled it and can’t find any evidence that Historical Geographic Magazine is a real magazine, let me just remind you that this article was first published on April 1st.

Posted in The Creation SoapBox | Tagged , | 1 Comment