The conclusion to the sold out show at the UnderGround. Karl Marx was an atheists, but now, according to some, so is your shoe. We need a word that means that?
Enjoy this bit of orange from the Underground.
Atheists Angry That I Define Atheism to Mean Atheism (part 4)
Atheists Angry That I Define Atheism to Mean Atheism (Part 3)
More of the sold out performance at the UnderGround. This bit of orange covers some recent videos, some of the reactions, such as the great anger some have because they define a word differently than we do, but at the same time they are ok with not existing. The dictionary Jihad attack in the name of the prophet Webster.
Atheists Angry That I Define Atheism to Mean Atheism (Part 2)
Continuing a sold out show at the UnderGround with some real comments from social media. “If I made this stuff up, I wouldn’t believe me.”
Learn how the same comment can call you a liar and agree with you in the same sentence. Then we learn how to question the question, especially when it involves invisible dinosaurs.
Atheists Angry That I Define Atheism to Mean Atheism (Part 1)
Live from the UnderGround, Bryan from ABitOfOrange.com tells the hilarious tales of his recent conversations with self-professed atheists on the social media. In the first installment, we learn about the Logical Fallacy of the Month, the fact that many atheists are apparently ok with not existing, and we get a visit from Carl the rabbit and Tom the Giraffe.
The Savage Truth About Atheism
A dramatic reading by Bryan from ABitOfOrange.com
Read the Full script here: https://rentafriend2000.wordpress.com/2014/08/07/mythbusters-save-the-day-again-or-the-savage-truth-about-atheism/
Atheism is STUPID.
While it may be true that some self-professing atheists are very intelligent, it doesn’t change the fact that atheism itself is AMAZINGLY stupid.
I sum up a few reasons why in this rant, but I elaborate far more on what Atheism is in my video, the 15 Tenets of Orthodox Atheism: https://youtu.be/SiNNgVkaFFE
First, most people who call themselves “Atheist” are using the word wrong. They are really agnostics. They lack a belief in God, but do NOT assert as a fact that God does not exist.
Of those who really mean “Atheist,” most of them are simply too lazy to find out what the word means, because if they knew what Atheism teaches, they would never apply that label to themselves.
The rest are probably insane. See the video links in the description of my video, the 15 Tenets of Orthodox Atheism: https://youtu.be/SiNNgVkaFFE
And check out these self professed atheists following the logic of their faith to it’s logical conclusion to tragic/hilarious results: https://youtu.be/X9ioXu-07z0
Atheism demands you believe that NOTHING created EVERYTHING. Those who profess this are forced to change the definition of “Nothing.” Good bye, sweet science. We hardly knew ye.
If atheism is true, then you may as well be a toaster. You cannot have free will, a unified self, and true knowledge is impossible. Which should be a good indication that Atheism is false. Because if you’re one of those people who say, “Oh, I suppose I don’t exist, I have no free will, and I can’t know anything,” then I don’t know what to do with you. Just stuff a pop tart in your mouth and sit quietly on the kitchen counter.
Atheism is COMPLETELY indefensible. There is not a single argument in its favor. Here are a couple of professional atheists making this point for me: https://youtu.be/WbxqvugoJuw
The point is, atheism is false. God is real, and he loves you.
John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.”
But I suspect you are all smart enough to know that already.
The 15 CORE Tenets of Orthodox Atheism!
It doesn’t take a deep search into social media to find a person who self identifies as an Atheist, but what IS an atheist? And what are the core tenets of the atheistic religion? today we will look at the 15 core tenets of Orthodox Atheism!
First, let’s define a few terms.
Atheist: from the latin for “No god/s.” Very simply, an atheist is an individual person who chooses to affirm the statement “There are no gods” as true.
This needs to be distinguished from Agnostic, which comes from the latin for “No knowledge.” This doesn’t mean they are completely ignorant, but their position is, “I do not have the information it takes to take a position.” It is an admission of ignorance, not actually a position.
All of that to say, the following list is the series of beliefs which I think a consistent Atheist must hold. Of course they can choose to reject any of them, but that makes them a heretic I suppose. Or maybe just a hypocrite, but we can discuss that some other time.
We begin with the very Creed which defines the Atheist religion:
- There is no God, gods, etc.
- There is no supernatural (Spirits, afterlife, etc.) No argument could be made AGAINST gods which would still allow for the Supernatural.
- Thus, materialism (The belief that ALL that exists is the physical universe of time, space, matter and energy).
- Thus, no miracles or magic (For there is no one/nothing to CAUSE a miracle in a material universe.)
- Thus, Determinism: ALL things and events are determined and controlled by the laws of physics and chemistry and all that follows from them.
5B. Thus, everything since the beginning of time has been pre-determined by those natural laws. Everything has always been and must always be as it is because of those initial conditions and COULD NOT have been different. - There is no basis for any objective value. Everything is merely the dance of atoms obeying the laws of physics and chemistry.
- Thus NO free-will, for a FREE choice cannot be a CAUSED choice, but the will of man is merely the result of his brain, which is matter, which is controlled and determined by the natural laws.
7B. While some may appeal to Quantum uncertainty to allow for free will, this is a false hope for the uncertainty is merely our ignorance of all the causal determiners at the quantum level, not ACTUAL randomness. And even if it were, it is not our minds that CHOOSE the random outcome of the quantum uncertainty on a macro level, but our will would be a result of that uncertainty. Once again, our choices would be CAUSED even if not predictable. - Thus, there can be NO Objective right and wrong. If we cannot choose to think, feel, or do, then we cannot choose to do other than we DO. Our thoughts and actions are determined by chemistry and physics just as the shape of a rock is.
8B. Also, with no transcendent moral law GIVER (God), there can be no objective moral law by which to distinguish between right and wrong, even if we COULD choose. - Also, there is no justification for condemning any action as wrong or celebrating any as right. Murder is merely the interruption of the various chemical processes which we categorize as “Life.” The victim’s desire to live is not based on a free choice- the choice to continue living- but is predetermined by natural law just as his hair color or height were. The same can be said for any act of justice, mercy, charity, etc.
9B. Thus, there is no justification for civil law. We can no more blame a murderer for killing than we can blame a magnet for hanging on the refrigerator door. Punishing crime is like punishing leaves for being the wrong color. - Life has no particular value because it is merely a chemical state, such as the burning of a campfire. Killing and pouring water on a camp fire are materially equal in the fact that they stop a chemical process from continuing. That “Life” is a more complex series of chemical processes does not give it some kind of transcendent value.
10B. Emotional appeals to morality are equally empty as emotions are merely a chemical state of the brain. The suffering of a victim or his loved ones is merely another chemical state which our brains are wired to dislike, just as thirst is a chemical state our bodies are wired to dislike. Love and compassion are also merely determined brain states. - Furthermore, the SELF is an illusion. Through a lifetime, a human’s cells are constantly replaced so that the ENTIRE Collection of cells may be replaced several times over his lifetime. Since a human is merely matter, then the man who dies is not the same man (collection and arrangement of matter) who was born, nor the same he was as a child, or a teen, or a middle aged man. He is not even a series of identical copies. Thus, “he” is a series of DIFFERENT collections of atoms spread out over time.
- Along the same lines, the perception of a unified self is false, as the brain is composed of many parts which work dependently and independently. The part which says of itself, “I” is no more the one brain state than a certain program which is running on a computer’s screen is the whole computer or all of its programs.
- Thus, there is no basis for reason or logical thought. If the brain is matter, determined by natural laws, then it cannot CHOOSE to accept as true or reject as false any information which it processes. Something “Known” or “Believed” is merely a particular chemical brain state, predetermined by the laws of nature.
13B. Furthermore, since the history of mankind is one of uninterrupted religion and belief in the spiritual and supernatural, we know that Evolution did not select for brains which are driven entirely by the apprehension of truth, but rather evolution created brains which believe false premises and fail to process data logically and reasonably so as to come to true conclusions. Because the history of humans is one of consistent belief in religions and superstitions, we know the human brain cannot be trusted to merely discover truth, but can be trusted to embrace falsehoods. Even the logic or reason which is used to reject religions and the supernatural is done with those brains, which means the result of such arguments cannot be trusted to be reasonable or true. - Thus, we cannot KNOW anything. We can merely have particular arrangements of brain states which we call “Knowledge” or “Beliefs” of certain propositions.
- Thus, Atheists don’t exist. Humans are merely a collection of changing matter in a particular arrangement (Same as any object in the universe), their unified self is an illusion, and they cannot choose to believe atheism or reject theism. One is an atheist, not because he has discovered it is true, or even because he has CHOSEN to believe it, but because the natural laws have caused his brain to be arranged in the manner which we call “Atheism,” just as his DNA have determined his hair color and height. Since we began by defining Atheist as an individual person who chooses to affirm the statement “There are no gods” as true, then we must conclude now that Atheists don’t exist.
So, it seems that I have just reasoned my way to the preposition, “If Atheism is true, Atheists do not exist.” Very sincerely I did not actually expect this when I started. I’ve not been arguing TO this conclusion, I’ve just been following the logic where it led. And I’ve wound up here, proving that, if Atheism is true, Atheists do not exist.
I can live with that. I never believed in them anyway.
Let me know what you think. If you disagree, let me know where my logic has gone off the rails and feel free to correct the argument. If you merely don’t like the conclusion, then you need to talk to yourself for a while. I’ll admit something here- as a Christian, I believe you’re really there. So you’ll have a real person to talk to.
For the video of this post, go here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiNNgVkaFFE
and to se Atheists declaring the tenets I list above, see the description under the video. You’ll get to hear the tenets right from the self declared atheists’ mouths.
Originally posted here: https://rentafriend2000.wordpress.com/2014/07/21/the-atheist-orthodoxy-challenge-by-raf2k/
Defining Evolution 20: The Case for Biblical Creation (A Chapter not Strictly Necessary)
You know what I love? Aside from Nachos, I mean. I love applying transitions and animations to Power Point Slide Shows. I had spent a Wednesday evening in my home office paradise, making a presentation that was truly boffo, and come the following day I was distracted all day by the thought of getting to present it to the lads down at Danny’s Bar, Grill, and House of Rabbelrousing.
This week’s presentation was a defense of the Biblical Creation Model (or as I like to call it, “What really happened.”). This part of my larger case was not, strictly speaking, actually necessary. The discussion which we had begun all those weeks ago was about the actuality of Darwinian Evolution. Carl had said Evolution was a fact, and I had said it was not. Since then we have been discussing the facts and I had concluded that Evolution fails on its own merits. One did not need to first accept Biblical creation to see that Darwinian Evolution did not happen. One only needed to understand Darwinian Evolution.
But my good friends Carl and Tom had asked me to present the case for Biblical Creation, and I was certainly happy to do so. Thus I had made a presentation for them, and for our friends Bill and Captain Blue Beard, to be presented this evening pre-Nachos. It was entitled, “In Defense of the Biblical Creation Model,” and subtitled, “What Really Happened.” Continue reading
Defining Evolution 19: The Epic Evolution FAIL Slideshow
Another Thursday had arrived, but the story actually begins the night before. What does a Rent-A-Friend do on a Wednesday night? The answer to that mystery can vary from week to week, depending if there is a new Duck Dynasty to watch, but this particular Wednesday night was spent making a holistic, fully encompassing, clip art-saturated Power Point Slide Show Presentation!
Calling on all of my mad office skills and the one semester of graphic design I took in college, I compiled the complete and total summation of information which we had shared on the many Thursdays past and created the Epic Evolution FAIL slideshow, Subtitled, “If you Understand Evolution, You Know Why Its Wrong,” and then sub sub titled “Chuck D and the New Monkey Band.”
When my friends arrived at Danny’s Bar, Grill, and House of Rabblerousing the following night, I was prepared to slide show present their argyle socks off. And I did. Metaphorically. Although in full disclosure, I did not check the state of their socks at the end, so it remains possible that I mean that literally. But I digress. Continue reading
Defining Evolution 18: Homologous Features
I was walking through the snow saturated winds on my way to Danny’s Bar, Grill, and House of Rabblerousing, cursing the name of Al Gore and wanting to scream out loud, “WHERE IS MY GLOBAL WARMING!?!?” You see, it was April, a time when, traditionally, the sun comes out and flowers bloom and temperatures sore ABOVE FREEZING. Yet here I was, slogging my way through puddles of slush, and squinting into curtains of huge, fluffy white snow.
I was last to arrive at our round table in the back near the dartboard, and my friends Carl, Tom, Bill, and Captain Blue Beard were already warming up with root beer and mozzarella sticks.
“Where is my global warming?!?!” I finally blurted out.
“It’s climate change now,” answered Bill.
“What? Since when?” I asked.
“Since a few years back,” Bill explained. “There was this huge, multinational meeting on global warming in Washington, and on the day of the meeting some of the attendees couldn’t make it due to snow.”
“I remember that,” said Blue Beard. “On the same day, there were snow fall in places what hadn’t seen snow in almost a century. I figure it’s a bad sign when you’re trying to get people to join the fight against global warming on a day with record snow.”
“I think they missed a prime opportunity,” suggested Tom. “If I were them, I would have declared our meeting a tremendous success. Only one meeting and we’ve beat back the heat until it snowed in the Amazon!”
“Hey, that’s funny right there!” exclaimed Blue Beard, giving Tom’s root beet a celebratory dink with his own.
“All that to say, it’s climate change now,” said Bill. “Because once they started trying to blame snow on warming, they realized they needed some new terminology.”
“I guess I shouldn’t be surprised,” said Carl, scowling. “You bunch of nuts aren’t just Darwin Deniers, you’re climate deniers too! What next? Are you going to try to convince us that the world is flat?”
“Hey,” I said, grabbing a mozzarella stick and pointing it at Carl for emphasis, “I’ve been to Hickman Nebraska, and I can tell you- it IS flat.” Continue reading